As Frida said best, I know there’s something going on. Personally I want to know what that is – the who, what, where, when, why and how and all sides of a story. If there’s an opinion about it to be made, it will be created in my own mind.

Call me old fashioned, but that’s the way the news was like when I grew up; I liked it then, and I still do now. However today and for many preceding years, the news has been nothing like how it was. Stocked with thin, incomplete coverage and opinion coming from talking heads in boxes on a screen – that’s not news to me.

As the saying goes, misery loves company, and after reading Slanted by Sharyl Attkisson, I realized I was in very good company. Attkisson is an award-winning investigative journalist and has worked for CNN and CBS in the past and is the host of the weekly news program Full Measure. Slanted chronicles the devolution of mainstream media news from the major TV networks and cable channels. Where their news reporting was once revered, it has become a shell of what it was, and biased or slanted towards a certain side or stakeholder in a news story.

With a strong desire to go back to the days when news was news, I certainly had takeaways from reading Slanted.

It’s not just me – Slanted presented thoughtful analysis of what I observe when I do watch or read the news. Often I am left head-shaking when I consume a news story, wondering why I feel like what I just read or saw was not the whole story, or if a perceived bias was correct or not.

Let’s all play the Substitution Game! – Attkisson uses a technique called the Substitution Game, where she will take a story that is biased towards one party – political or not – and substitute one side’s name for the other, typically in a story against one of those parties. Almost instantly a lightbulb will go off over my head realizing how absurd or incredulous a story appears when that’s done.

Who said there’s no money in objective journalism? – I am willing to pay for it, and am not willing to pay for bad, biased journalism, let alone consume it. This is part of the reason why we haven’t had cable TV in my household for years.

As much as I enjoyed Slanted, it’s unfortunate such a book had to be written. It provides great context and insights from others who work in news media. I enjoyed the interview Attkisson had with Lou Waters, with whom she co-anchored on CNN back in the 1990’s. Where Waters is named, many of the other interview subjects and not, and my guess was to protect their identities as they likely still work in mainstream news. Had more of them come forward that would have provided even more credibility to the state of news, but I can understand why.

If you are curious as to what may be going on behind the story in news coverage, I highly recommend reading Slanted. I purchased my copy, actually pre-ordering it when it was announced back last April. I have in the past purchased and wrote takeaways on Attkisson’s other books – Stonewalled and The Smear. As I give away all books I read, this one is going to a colleague whom I had a recent conversation with on the news and feels similarly to me on today’s reporting. You can always get your own copy with one of the links in this post, and note that if you do click and buy, I earn a few cents.

---

This is from The Hot Iron, a journal on business and technology by Mike Maddaloni.

---

Did you enjoy this? Subscribe to The Hot Iron by RSS/XML feed or Read by Email

Book Take-Aways • (0) Comments • Permalink